Improving MnO2 Catalyzed Polysulfide Generation, 2010 TAPPI PEERS Conference
Please Note: This document will be available in PDF format in the "My Electronic Documents" link on the home page once your order has been completed. Please make sure you have the latest version of Acrobat Reader. Click on the Acrobat Reader icon to check for the latest version, it’s FREE. To print a hardcopy of a PDF file correctly you must have a postscript printer. If you are not sure if your printer is a postscript printer please refer to your owner’s manual.
Two mills in North America are presently using polysulfide in the cooking process to preserve carbohydrate yield. One mill uses the Moxy™ process and the other uses the Paprilox™ process to generate the polysulfide. Parts of the mechanism of the Paprilox™ process are unclear. Knowing the mechanism has value because it may allow improvements in both the choice of operating conditions and the design of the system.
The questions that guided this work were: which sulfur species participate in the reaction, what is the reduced form of manganese in the catalytic system, and what is the cause of the dissolution of manganese dioxide? It was found that there are some major differences in the mechanism from that established for the stoichiometric formation of polysulfide using MnO2: Sulfide (S2-) rather than hydrosulfide (HS-) is the acting sulfur species; MnS rather than MnO is the reduced species that is formed; and MnS is the dissolved species that is catalytically reoxidized to MnO2.
These findings show that high sulfidity liquor is not the most critical requirement for liquors to be used for the Paprilox™ process but high alkalinity which ensures a high S2- concentration because of the S2-/HS- equilibrium. This work also shows that a soluble species is a critical intermediate which, unfortunately, then precludes the use of a reactor using MnO2 coated surfaces as these will dissolve and not be regenerated.